I accidentally posted this first in the year 1, so I am cutting and pasting some of it here. I saw someone else had asked a question about in-depth vs core, and I'd like to expand on it more...
My sophomore son is struggling with the history. This is our second year at the rhetoric level. This week (wk2), between the core history and in-depth history readings, he was assigned 85 pages of reading. It is not simple reading. He is a bright student, doing Calculus for math, but he dreads school now. Is it necessary to do the in-depth readings? It says on the credit descriptions that you need to read both of them (3/4) to get a history credit. But I wonder why the delineation between core and in-depth if both are necessary. Wouldn't the in-depth be for honors level? Is there a trimming chart like there is for literature? How do I know what to cut? If he is to answer the questions, he needs to read everything. Where do I draw the line between high standards and excellence, and overwhelming my child? I have been trying to read through much of it with him to help him digest it, but I have 3 other children, and not enough time to do this every day. We read with the questions in hand, but that doesn't always help. In fact, sometimes the questions add to the frustration. I would love anyone's input. Thanks for listening.
Amy in WI


Reply With Quote